top of page
17
The Bi-Weekly Magazine - Friday Showing
For Friday 7/19/13

Showing this week

Smilla's Sense of Snow, showing at the AFI Silver Theater and Culture Center, Silver Spring, MD Sat. 8/31 11am - Sun. 9/1 11am - Tue. 9/3 4:30pm - Wed. 9/4 4:30pm - Thurs. 9/5 4:30pm

 

 

w

Winning and Losing

On The Women’s Side

Do Bras Fit Women?

   Briefs on Bras

Invention of the Cocktail

A Local Story?

Radical Getting Along?

Upset about the same things.

U

Winning and Losing On The Women’s Side


A year ago next month, Shulie (Shulamith Firestone) died a sad and lonely death. It could be said

that as a dedicated feminist she was once the most influential organizer, theoretician and

spokesperson at the grass-roots level in the U.S. Ms. Firestone was a leader in the sixties movement,

which she called the second wave of feminism. The first wave being about the woman’s vote

ending in a victory in 1920. Controversy was brewing from the start within the movement while

many wanted “to put bringing women in full participation in the mainstream of American society”,

Shulie, known in the movment as a firebrand, had a new vision of public and private life entirely.


In what amounts to a belated obit, Susan Faludi, in the April 15th New Yorker gives a loving account

of not only Ms. Firestone but of sixties and seventies feminism. Titled ‘The Death of a Revolutionary’.

It fascinated me and is the primary reference point of this reflection and is highly recommended for

any thinking about role of women. It is a quite sad but enlightening story.


A little over 5ft. tall, Shulie, also known as a fireball, shot across the sky in a powerful ball of energy and intelligence. Numerous grass-roots feminist organizations many of which generated seeds of other new like-minded organizations were founded by her, usually with another feminist co-founder. Influenced by Karl Marks and Freud she put together their ideas from unique feminist viewpoint and she was a vital connection in the networks of women mostly in Chicago and New York sharing a flexibility and ironically a feminism which she couldn’t control and was repeatedly fired from in the end.


Control of the feminist movement messages and direction prove to be an unsettled area even today. To many women identifying with feminism it is or should be equalitarian, meaning no leaders and in much the same way the Occupy movement suffered from the no-leaders debate, the good minds organizing the movement were quickly seen as acting like males needing to control. As Shulie put it in a comment to her live-in boy-friend, she had been forced out by an anti-leadership faction. “and guess who became the new leaders? The anti-leaders.”


This consistent rather anti-intellectual and anti-achievement mentality led to an existential aloneness not only for Shulie but her generation of feminist activists. Soon after she permanently resigned from the movement altogether, saying in a letter of resignation to The Congress to Unite Women, “... womens rage masquerading as a pseudo-egalitarian radicalism under the ‘pro-women’ banner was turning into a frighteningly vicious anti-intellectual fascism of the left.” Her proclamation led several women including, Jo Freeman, who had organized the first abortion speak-out, to meet and “vowed to fight the problem”


“Instead each of us slipped back into our own isolation,” said Freeman, “the result was that most of the

women ... dropped out as I had done. Two ended up in a hospital with nervous breakdowns.” Faludi goes on

to document very sad results of important feminist leaders including, Kate Millett, author of, Sexual Politics,

who had been forced to reveal she was bisexual and then denounced for not having revealed it earlier. She

had a break-down and was committed to a mental hospital. After Ti-Grace Atkinson, resigned she was often

quoted as saying “Sisterhood is powerful, it kills” actually she originally said, “it kills mostly sisters.” Meredith

Tax, wrote in Firestones periodical, Notes from the Second Year, “... the condition of women constituted a

state of ‘female schizophrenia’ - a realm of unreality where a woman either belonged to a man or was

‘nowhere, disappeared, teetering on the edge of a void with no work to do and no felt identity at all’ ”


The story of Ms. Firestone ended after years of suffering decline, she was declared paranoid schizophrenic, in

and out of hospitals and with rising and falling levels of support. Her body was found after several days in her,

small fifth floor walk-up in a tenement apartment on East 10th Street. She had been surviving on public

assistance and no food was found in her place.


This typically long and detailed, New Yorker style article by Ms. Faludi is a among other things a meditation on

the women’s movement, the left of the sixties and the paradox of the sexes.

-----------------
- Ms. Firestone's important writings, Notes From the First Year, a periodical she founded in 1968, followed in 70 and 71 by Notes From the Second Year and the Third Year, her book, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, published in 1970, called brilliant and preposterous by the New York Times, it climbed in sales as it was being ridiculed on talk shows. Her final volume, Airless Space, was published in 1998.

Good for lunch

Caution the children

credit: one million viginas


Well ya see there was these two bigwigs down in Washington, April 16, 1846, a hundred years and 22 Days before Jim Wells was born in Evanston Il. Anyway one of em offended the another’s honor so they as per custom of the day agreed to conduct a duel in gentleman’s style. All the  parties headed from near the capitol of the United States to Maryland and arrived near the dueling grounds used by Congressmen and others, before dinner. They enjoyed the meal In the Inn of their choosing, the Palo Alto Inn in Bladensburg across the Baltimore Road from the George Washington Inn. The area was also known for gambling and drinking.

The duelers, John A Hopkins, of Fairfax VA, his second Col. Denmead Magione and Baron Chalono an attache of the French legation with his second Chevalier Lugno, representative of the King of the Two Sicilles were the key elements of a 12 person party there for the occasion, including some Congressmen and two doctors. It’s is not known what Hopkins and the Baron were mad about.

Following tradition all moved to the dueling grounds at the first light of dawn the next day April 17. Hopkins shot Baron Chalono who lay wounded on the ground, the two doctors at his side. Hopkins went to him as well after making the hit.

The story goes that the Baron was so gored, drenched in blood that Hopkins became faint and his second Col. Magione and members of his side took him straight to the good old Palo Alto, where bartender Jack (John Welby Henderson of NC) was asked to make something special to help poor Hopkins and to celebrate his survival I suppose. Hopkins recovered at once and Col. Magione known as a connoisseur of wet goods saw at once that the moment had been historic putting an account of the wonderful cocktail in a Washington paper the next day and word was spread quickly around the world by the many various representatives gathered in the United States capital at the time.

                                                                         source - http://ghostsofdc.org/2013/06/27/palo-alto-birth-cocktai/

 

The First Cocktail Made In Maryland right next door to DC, in Bladensburg

Below The Washington Post, published on December 20th, 1908.

The historic George Washington Inn, Bladensburg MD

                        It Is Still Standing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington_House_%28Bladensburg,_Maryland%29                                        Above photo Sept. 1899

Over 600 Likes as of Thurs.

Unhappy Bout the Same Things
When talking politics, which by the way is OK, with a few substitutions of key words and

slight rephrasing, arguments could be left wing or right wing. For example, replace the word

corporations with the government when it comes to telling where the evil is.

 

Can it be that on some of the most important issues in our society, we need to recognize

that we Americans and Canadians, are not so much polarized as we are unhappy about the

same basic things. Living in a land famous for empowering the people and liberty we are

feeling powerless.

 

I maintain it is this feeling of being powerless that feeds the corruption in the system.

Isn’t easier to take advantage of those people or systems where the individuals accept that

there is nothing they can do? The powerless feeling when seeking of an altruistic or otherwise

solution to common problems can lead to the wide range of polarized actions and outlooks.

 

I’m not among those who think that it doesn’t matter if we have Obama, Romney or Bush for

President or in Canada, Harper or Tredeau as Prime Minister, it certainly does make some big differences if many are feeling that the system can't work, that there isn’t a real choice. Saying it doesn’t matter may be an effective way of expressing anger and discontent but in effect it is also saying there is no solution except vigilantism or acceptance?

 

As I see it, regardless of politics it is individuals who empower themselves. Why couldn’t it be that the personally empowered can have an embracing dialogue and perhaps agree on changes that after discussion would no longer be radical or too radical for popular acceptance? The idea of dialogue is not that all will be in alignment on politics but that a system we can live with, of our own choosing is something we can do.

 

The fact is that wherever humans exist there is some kind of government and it is desirable for people to partake in it for their own good.

Isn’t it always such ideas that led to all our democratic systems to start with? When the people agree on some basic changes, I know the changes will happen, no quasi-free or centrally run system can stop that from coming about. No matter how far off change may be, holding it as a goal which we all can help bring about, is the only way to find a happy solution. Essentially what good can ever come out of giving up? What value can come from a system that does not empower individuals to do their best, personally or for our lovely country?

 

The Next Issue of Friday Showing will be August 2nd

PayPal ButtonPayPal Button
bottom of page